When I see a recurring lapse in critical thinking, it seems
obvious to me that maybe it’s something we should all talk about and see if we
can’t tune-up our collective critical thinking skills. The problem I will address is one that first hit me hard years ago, that I addressed twice
yesterday with two different groups of people, and that has bothered me the years between.
The experience that hit me hard was one in which a woman, who
had followed for years but said little in an internet group, posted a long, in-depth
character assessment of about twenty of the group’s most active members. She
claimed she had observed and written this as a class project. For the most
part, I agreed with her assessments of others, so I was relieved and flattered
by her complimentary words about me.
One member decided, since the words about me were more positive
than the assessments of others, the only explanation was that I had pretended
to be the student writing the paper. Anyone the least bit familiar with me
knows that I speak my mind and would have no desire to hide my opinions behind
a fake name. How could that have been lost on her? Not only did she decide and
state that, she spent days insisting – INSISTING REPEATEDLY IN EVERY WAY SHE
COULD FIND TO SCREAM IT – that she knew, positively, that it was me.
My last words to her on this or any topic were: You
have made a fool of yourself and you must now live with the tormented doubt
that I know something you don’t know. I absolutely know that I did not write
this, and you can’t possibly know if I did or didn’t.
At least half of the group sided with her. Years later, the
woman who posted it admitted that she had posed as two members in the group, a
male and a female. The male character she played was her husband, who had no
idea. ‘He’ and been a close friend of mine, who private messaged me constantly
to talk about topics from the group, about his problems in his marriage, about
our kids (who also were friends on the internet), and about the other women in
the group who flirted with him despite knowing he had a wife. A couple of those
women also talked privately with me about their crushes on him. The real wife,
of course, knew all of these conversations because she was posing as him. She also
called me on the phone often, but I didn’t know she was posing as him at the
time.
The ‘damage’ was only to me and I honestly don’t consider it
damage. Losing friends who didn’t believe in me in the first place wasn’t much
of a loss. Finding out Kyle never really existed and was his wife’s pretend
character on an internet site was funny to me. I had no reason to be ashamed
because I had advised Kyle wisely on how to deal with his marital problems
instead of trying to lure him away from his wife.
But, when this same lapse in critical thinking enters political
discussions the damage can lead to conclusions that are life and death for
people, or that result in babies locked in cages to die, or activists wearing
targets on their backs for militias that have been incited to 2A them. It
matters. There should be no game playing, misinforming, refusal to think things
through, denial of truths in political discussions.
I stated a fact about a candidate yesterday. A woman mocked me.
I said she was making a fool of herself and if that hadn’t been her goal, she
might want to rethink and start over. She doubled down.
Someone else confirmed that she, too, had seen exactly what
I said I had seen. The woman was unkind to her, too. This went back and forth a
few times so I googled, and delivered the words from the candidate’s Wikipedia page,
with the comment STILL THERE.
The woman who had supported me told the one who had mocked
me that she should probably apologize. I honestly wanted her to say, “Oh my
gosh, I really didn’t know this, thanks for telling me.” Something like that. Instead,
she blocked me.
Within an hour, I was on another page where someone was insisting
that the same candidate had not done what someone claimed she had. A couple of
people said they had seen it. Like the mocking woman, he doubled down. Someone
suggested he google it because it was out there to find if he wanted. His
response was, “I work with her. I know more about her than you do.”
My response this time was to remind him that, no matter how
close you are to someone, you don’t necessarily know everything about that
person. He could just ask anyone whose mate had cheated to realize how true
this is. But ‘I know something you don’t know’ is apparently something he believes
he can hide from if he wants.
On a positive note, another person
just said to me, “Oh Yikes. I definitely need to research her. Thanks for the
information.” And restored my faith that there are people who will seek truth –
she neither grabbed my words and ran with them nor denied them. She said the
word research and made my day.
Please defend truth and critical
thinking so they don’t disappear.
No comments:
Post a Comment