Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Lessons Learned From Nixon, Kucinich, and Occupy





I learned the dangers of single-issue and uninformed votes with my first vote. Richard Nixon said he would get us out of Viet Nam and that was all I needed to hear. My boyfriend’s knee injury would save him from the draft but my brother, my cousins, and other friends weren’t lucky enough to have bad knees and they weren’t foolish enough to shit their drawers like Cat Scratch loser. I was naïve, uninformed, hard-headed, defiant, and more interested in all the wrong things so I was going to take what pitifully little information I had and make a huge mistake no matter what anyone said. Not only did I regret disappointing my intelligent, liberal parents, I’m in my sixties now and still haven’t completely forgiven myself for being that naïve.

I wish I could say that was the end of my naiveté but it wasn’t. Not even close. It was, however, the end of my single-issue, uninformed voting. My lingering gullibility exhibited itself in the error of thinking that everyone else learned what I did, when I did. (It’s okay to laugh.)

Skip ahead to the 2004 primary race, when I was a huge fan of Dennis Kucinich and still in deep mourning over the 2000 disaster. Finally, I was surrounded by people who I assumed disliked Bush for all the legitimate reasons that I disliked him, and who I was certain could recite every word of Kucinich’s platform as easily as I could. It was refreshing to be around laid-back people who worked toward positive change, got involved, and were hopeful. I turned my home into a campaign hangout, made and stocked posters for every position, occasion and event, spent every waking minute on the phone, writing letters, organizing events and fund raisers, and talking to anyone who would listen – even some who didn’t. I believed the people I met and worked with on that campaign were kindred spirits who shared my ideals and willingness to absorb and deliver facts.

It was years before I admitted the whole truth about how wrong I was, maybe because in order to come to that conclusion I had to think negatively about people with whom I had bonded. A few were everything I believed them to be and are still friends even if we don’t agree on everything political. The others fell into several categories: single-issue voters (legalizing marijuana or absolute pacifism), people who wanted to hang out and eat free food, and, most disappointing of all, people who thought Kucinich could help them force old people out of the Democratic Party so they could turn it into what they wanted it to be. The last group caused me a great deal of embarrassment and actually caused me to be the somewhat abrasive, outspoken person I am today. Even though I was probably as progressive at heart as most of them, I also knew that it was not only wrong – it was impossible to force people to be where they weren’t ready to be.

To me, people who try to force instead of lead, and who insist that everything must be their way or no way are bullies. They are also regressive because they do more harm than good. Some of those people left the Democratic Party when things didn’t go their way. Yet, they still believe they are justified in representing themselves as Democrats so they can infiltrate meetings, groups, and discussions where they do nothing but criticize the party, spread ridiculous notions like “both parties are the same”, and even share right-wing, dishonest talking points about Democratic candidates. One puts his name on ballots as a Democratic candidate, thinking that gives him credibility when he joins every liberal or progressive group he can find and tries to damage Democratic candidates in almost every race.

The real wake-up came when some of them treated President Obama with the same disdain they had for his predecessor. Soon, I noticed they hated all politicians except for brief moments when one is championing their single issue. That might not have been totally bad if they hadn’t given those people credit for lip-service without action.

Then came Occupy – the lesson of a lifetime for me. I was thrilled to see young people take to the street regarding a problem that affects so many. I (have no life) watched from the first day via live cam on the internet, paying close attention to their organization – NO groups, NO political parties, NO religion, NO main stream media, NO leaders, NO violence, NO staging, NO defiance of law and order. Perfect! A movement of individuals willing to take on a cause.

I watched for days, wishing I was young and healthy enough to make the trip and join them. Instead, I contacted them to ask if I could start a group in my city. We don’t have Wall Street (the part that so many forgot quickly) but we do have financial institutions and people who had lost homes to foreclosure. They responded quickly to say they were worried that the purpose would be diluted, but would consider my request. While I awaited their decision, I investigated permits and locations, and continued to watch and learn all they were doing. Especially pleased that they continued to avoid main stream media and were respectful to law enforcement, even when arrests started, I liked this movement more every day.

I contacted the many people and organizations that I had worked with when organizing events in the past and explained the Occupy movement, which was still so new that most people had heard nothing about it yet. I invited all of them to participate--as individuals, not organizations or groups-- for a united cause. I shared the list of NOs with everyone. They seemed to understand and even to share my excitement about the format. I asked everyone to tune in to the live streaming on the internet and watch what these young people were doing.

Finally, the Occupy Wall Street people contacted me and said to go ahead since others had without asking, and thanked me for asking and focusing on duplicating exactly what they were doing. I created an event page on Facebook, talked with the city and local law enforcement, got permits for camp areas as well as sanctioned marching routes, obtained legal counsel for the group, posted flyers around town . . . The response was overwhelming – and exciting.

Until (self-described) anarchists flooded the event site with their own agenda and to let me (and anyone watching the public event page) know they would come armed, no matter what I, or anyone else, said about it. Their leader (also, self-described) contacted me to explain that he was teaching this group how to force the police to arrest them to “make a statement”. I reviewed the list of NOs (see above) with him and said I thought his group seemed to have an agenda of their own that was not consistent with the movement. He said I was wrong to get permits and his people didn’t like it.

Eventually, the leader of the anarchists called to tell me I was correct and that the anarchist group had gotten out of hand, scaring him, even. He agreed that we should have permits and do things peacefully. Because of the NO leaders request, I actually had permits for two locations so there could be – according to Occupy Wall Street’s protocol - a group vote to decide which we would stick with. I gave the leader of the anarchist group, and posted on the event page, a location between the two for a meet-up spot at which we could vote and proceed to the location most people wanted.

The night before, self-proclaimed leader of the anarchists also proclaimed himself leader of Occupy My City. Not only did he not like permits and the NO leaders aspects, he also didn’t like the NO main stream media part so he managed to get himself on local television for an interview as the self-appointed leader.

I had lunch with activist friends the morning of the kick-off and expressed my concerns. I am a middle-aged, disabled woman. Sleeping on the street for however-long-it-takes was not feasible. My goal was to organize, procure a safe location, and let the young people take this event where it needed to go. My friends nodded where appropriate, wrinkled their brows when I spoke of anarchists with guns, nodded again when I reviewed the list of Nos, and smiled when I said drummers would be there to add the peaceful tone to marches, etc. We left the restaurant and went to the bigger, more accommodating, longer-term accessible location that we felt certain the group would choose, to drop off the things we had brought with us and meet other friends. Then, we were to walk over to the meet-up location to join everyone there.

I was doing a live interview with public radio when the leader of the anarchists came and led my friends over to the meet-up location. After my interview, I waited for my friends to return but they didn’t. One of them called to tell me I should come join them because, “They have music and food and politicians giving speeches (another NO),” and this group and that group were there handing out literature and signing people up, and . . .

Shortly before going to the police station to relinquish my permits, I admitted, finally, for sure, that many of the people I had been associated with were not at all who or what I thought they were. Food and music were all it took for them to abandon the hard-working people at Occupy Wall Street. The movement was infiltrated everywhere, by self-serving people with agendas of their own.

A couple of weeks later, I passed the lingering few occupiers in my city. A young man stopped me to ask if I knew about Occupy. I smiled and asked him to tell me about it. He explained that first, they keep the police so busy they have to use overtime, and then they force them to start arresting people . . . I stopped him there and introduced myself. He did know who I was, despite the many articles and rumors stating that I was a nobody who had never organized anything and was only trying to ruin what the anarchists planned (which resulted in me receiving threats). I told him that, as much as I wanted to avoid main stream media as requested, I would stand in front of every camera I could find and repeat what he told me the first time anyone tried to implicate the police department, who had graciously tried to accommodate the movement.

My organizing days ended with Occupy, not because of the threats but because I saw how easily my activist friends had been manipulated into doing everything that they had been asked not to do, some for self-serving purposes. Their perspection of this is that I was angry because I wanted everything ‘my’ way when there was no ‘my’ way. I wanted to respect and honor the group of young people who started the Occupy movement on Wall Street by not allowing others to use and damage their name for self-serving purposes.

Today, I am aware enough to spot the people who haven’t done their homework and who are preying on followers. Memes make that possible (the preying and identifying) without even leaving the house.



In conclusion, I learned not to trust:

  • ·   followers
  • ·   self-serving people, organizations, and groups
  • ·   people who are more interested in being cool, accepted, or popular than they are in finding and sharing truth
  • ·   meme and petition pushers, especially memes without links or ownership
  • ·   petitions based on false information



I hope everyone will pay attention and spend more time questioning.

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Why I Support Hillary Clinton (from the archives)



            I support Hillary Clinton because she speaks to individual needs with a convincing understanding of what life is like on each rung of the American ladder. I believe she knows me, and everyone who is not like me. While speaking directly to the lives of individuals, the solutions she offers indicate to me that she has looked for what is best for everyone concerned, and her everyone includes the world. This tells me Hillary Clinton is wise and caring – two things that I look for in a leader.
            I support Hillary Clinton because she demonstrates extraordinary strength and independence, carefully balanced by loyalty and intelligence. Her ability to function under extreme pressure with grace, dignity, and kindness is remarkable. I want an intelligent leader who maintains dignity under pressure.
            I support Hillary Clinton because I believe she has one foot planted firmly on each side of the line that divides this country. As much as I would love to see her hug a tree with one arm while she signs off on universal health care and education with the other, I respect her for not promising more than she knows she can deliver during this division. Re-uniting this country is probably the biggest challenge (well, after hoping the votes are counted) the winner of the next election faces. I believe she can do that.
            I support Hillary Clinton because I believe I can sleep at night with my life in her hands. I do not expect her to sneak a hidden agenda through while I’m sleeping; do not think I will have to worry about what she had done behind my back when I wasn’t watching; and do not fear her decisions. I expect her to be a public servant, a representative of WE THE PEOPLE, not to think that her position is about power – or about HER.
            I support Hillary Clinton because, even if I do not agree with all of her positions, I trust her to think, to listen, to learn, to grow, and to explain. I think she will tell me the truth, even if it is not what I want to hear.
            I support Hillary Clinton because she is successful, as an individual, as a partner, and as a politician. I think she would make a great friend. I believe in her and I respect her. I want a leader that I can respect.
            I am fortunate that my party gives me great choices. I trust and respect Hillary Clinton, Dennis Kucinich, Barack Obama, and Joe Biden.

Sandy Knauer 2007

Your Green Is Showing





You can stand in front of your mirror and call that green reflection by my name for the rest of your life. You will still be you, I will still be me, and I have lost nothing.

At first, I laughed at the jealousy accusations. Later, the frequency of them annoyed me. Now that I have taken the time to consider why you make a claim like this, my pity is stronger than my laughter or anger. (But that doesn’t mean I am going to accept your ugliness.)

Jealousy is not foreign to me. I used my lifetime supply between 1969 and 1972. Three years of torturing myself with a useless, negative emotion was enough, especially when I realized that it was more likely to cause me to lose than protect what I wanted. With wisdom came freedom, something I will not give up for any person, thing, or talent. If you knew me at all, you would not make a fool of yourself by bringing this into question. You would also know that, even in my teens, I was wise enough to restrict my jealousy only to something I wanted. So far, the people you falsely state that I am jealous of have only demonstrated characteristics and abilities that I would work to rid myself of if I had them.

Envy is a different story. If you want to spread information about me, you are welcome to tell the world that I am envious. I have run across work that honestly makes me ache with envy (Joe Ferguson’s writing would be the most recent example, Barack Obama’s fortitude is the strongest, and my father’s ability to love the longest surviving). I suspect you will find it impossible to believe that, instead of wanting those people to disappear before anyone finds me falling short in comparison, I want them around to admire and learn from.

Envy, as I know it, is not a negative emotion. I appreciate people who give me reason to envy them.

Now that I have explained this in detail, I expect you to keep your green under control.

www.sandyknauermorgan.com